Facebook. Entfernen. Wir verwenden Cookies, um Inhalte zu personalisieren, Werbeanzeigen ma. Wenn du auf unsere Webseite klickst oder hier navigierst, stimmst du der Erfassung von Informationen durch Cookies auf und au. Weitere Informationen zu unseren Cookies und dazu, wie du die Kontrolle dar. The Josef Hasslberger page: Physics. CONSIDERATIONS ON LIGHT, MATTER, GRAVITY AND MAGNETISM. Physics, the science which should be explaining to us how the universe came about and what it consists of, seems to have arrived at the end of a blind alley. Its descriptions of the origin and the workings of our universe get more and more complex, less and less agreed- upon and they are definitely not going to accompany us into the 2. We are at the beginning of the space- age. In order to survive in that new age, we need clear and unequivocal descriptions of physical phenomena. With so many events in flux since we are in a vortex for the future, it is important to review them. The Montgomery County Sniper Shootings.What I see as the most grave shortcoming of establishment physics is its adamant refusal to investigate or at least accept the possibility of a creative life force. There is also a one- sided emphasis on entropic, (explosive, radiative, centrifugal) phenomena in physics and consequently also in current technology, to the almost total exclusion of the constructively ordering, non- entropic phenomena such as brought about by implosion and centripetal or vortex motion. The descriptive language used by physics is mathematics. It is adequate to describe a number of observed phenomena, but depending on what phenomenon is to be described, physicists conveniently switch mathematics, thereby changing their whole frame of reference. There is no one theory that can adequately describe all the forces known to exist and the search for a unified field theory is running into serious problems. The trouble is not where physicists commonly look. It seems to be more a question of philosophical or religious outlook. Our view of nature was conditioned first by the great philosophers of ancient Greece and then, for a long time, by the orthodox religions prevalent in current western civilization.
Ironically, the physicist who denies the action of a creator, just by this very denial limits the scope of his investigations. So it might be that progress in our time has become dependent again on philosophy, on that science of thinking, of looking at basics and drawing conclusions that is unencumbered by the specialization so prevalent in the physical sciences. The following is a speculative description, in simple terms, of the basic workings of the universe. THE NATURE OF LIGHT. Light sometimes behaves as a wave and sometimes as a stream of particles. The wave theory seems to be confirmed by the observation of interference patterns and the separation of light into colors after passing through a prism, while other phenomena validate the particle (corpuscular) theory. This paradox is so far unresolved and has given rise to a theory proclaiming that light has a dual nature, in other words that light may be both particle and wave at the same time. Although photons, in reverence to this theory, are generally thought to be . Particles, such as photons, could hardly be travelling through the immense reaches of space through which we can observe the light of distant stars and galaxies. Imagine all of the immense . The expenditure in terms of mass, even assuming a very small mass for each single photon, would be tremendous. The stars would be exhausted in a relatively short time. So in order to travel interstellar distances, as light and all other electromagnetic waves evidently travel, they must be waves and not particles. To allow this travel, a medium through which these waves proceed, has been postulated. It has been called various names and has even been . Whatever may be the view of the scientific establishment, space is not empty. It is against this background, which so far has eluded our direct observation, that electromagnetic waves propagate. This space background or primordial energy field has a very high energy density.(4)(5) It has been described as an immense field of pure energy, comparable to a . This field has so far been very elusive and no direct detection or measurement has been possible. However in November 1. Japanese physicist Shinichi Seike reported that he had succeeded in proving the presence of this high energy tachyon field in space.(6)It is this space background that gets excited in wavelike motions by the source or emitter of radiation. Radiation waves propagate in spheric form, in all directions from the source. An analogy in a two- dimensional frame of reference is the surface of a body of water, on which waves propagate in concentric rings. Vortex International Realty is a boutique luxury residential and commercial real estate company serving all of South Florida. Located in the historic South Florida. This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Vortex. If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the. If you’re in need of replacements for your 1967 Pontiac GTO, our selection of custom & factory headlights includes projector beams, LEDs, Halos and more. Physics, the science which should be explaining to us how the universe came about and what it consists of, seems to have arrived at the end of a blind alley. In our space background, we have concentric shells or spheres of wave propagation. The speed of propagation of these waves is determined by the medium of propagation and is what we call the . There is no particular reason for this speed to be either finite or constant. For example, if in the path of an electromagnetic wave we add to the background field a physical medium that allows the passage of light (such as glass or water), the speed of propagation changes for the duration of passage through the medium, but once the additional medium has been passed and the wave travels once more in the background field alone, it will resume its . How is it possible, that one moment light seems to be a wave and the next a stream of particles? To comprehend this, we must revolutionize our concept of what is mass and what is a particle. In my view particles are nothing more than local irregolarities, local self sustaining . The properties commonly associated with particles such as mass, inertia and solidity arise out of the movement, the spin, of these tiny tornadoes. A similar view has been put forward by Tewari with his Space Vortex Theory.(7)One fundamental kind of particle, and probably the buildingstone of all other, more complex particles, is the photon. A photon is postulated to be the result of the collision of an electromagnetic wave of a certain wavelength (light spectrum) with an impenetrable barrier, such as a material object. The impact causes a local disturbance of the background field that can be perceived by the human eye and by our measuring instruments. They will form chains, which in turn will collapse and form . Thus electrons, protons and neutrons as well as the various forms of quarks and leptons, which are observed after smashing atoms in particle accelerators, may be nothing more than variously configured aggregates of photons. What we term to be positive or negative charge is determined by direction of rotation, each subatomic particle being itself configured as a rotating system and thus exhibiting a certain spin. Just as photons combine to form matter, forming subatomic and eventually atomic particles, the reverse may happen. Particles of matter may become unstable and dissolve, emitting photons or even cause the formation of electromagnetic waves. A theory of how matter may form through aggregation of photons has been proposed by Helmut Hoegl in 1. Oldano, basing himself on the work of Todeschini, has done some detailed work describing the possible geometries of aggregates of the mini- tornadoes or vortexes that make up matter.(9) It has often been found that the microcosm and the macrocosm are of a remarkable similarity in structure and function. Our view of the atom, in fact, is similar to that of the photon described above. On an even larger level, we may see the same pattern in planetary systems, in galaxies and - why not - in the universe itself. All of these expressions of form as we might call the accumulations of matter are thus nothing else than trapped or frozen energy, . SPACE AND TIME. If energy is contained in the background medium of space and can be converted into matter through the process of . Space itself is a transcendental reality. It may contain energy and matter, but it has to exist before these latter two can be introduced. Thus space itself as well as the energy contained in it, first in amorphous form and then as light, are the result of creative action. It is useless to delude ourselves, ascribing original creation to a nebulous . Without an original act of creation, no universe has so far been known to exist. This universe happens to have been created with three dimensions and if we assume, for mathematical convenience, that there could be more dimensions this might be true for other universes, but in our present universe, such assumptions must remain what they are - mathematical conventions. Even time is not a fourth dimension, although we may mathematically represent time in this way. In reality, time is associated with motion of energy and matter through space. It has no independent existence of its own other than as a convention to measure motion. We measure time by how long it takes our planet to revolve around its axis and by the length of a complete orbit of this planet around our sun. In the absence of energy and matter however, space would be without time. INERTIA AND GRAVITY. According to Einstein, gravitational and inertial acceleration cannot be subjectively distinguished one from the other. It would seem logical therefore to assume that gravity and inertia are two manifestations of one and the same phenomenon. With increased mass, that resistance or inertia will increase. The conservation of this motion is postulated to be the result of a macroscopic vortex in background space, built up by the motion of the mass, which then tends to maintain that motion. If the egg is held by fine strings, it will create a vortex in the water . Another example, always using the medium of water, is the ability of trout to stand motionless without visible effort in the most fast flowing stream of water. It is caused in a similar way as inertia, by a resistance against movement relative to the background of space. There may be an inflow of background field towards large bodies, causing a movement of background field relative to the surface of such large bodies, which is felt as gravitation. This force is stronger near the surface of the mass and diminishes with increasing distance, the inflow becoming gradually slower or . The close proximity of the large mass prevents the build- up of a vortex as with inertial motion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |